Can I Get Federal Disability Benefits for Long COVID

long covid graphic with text and virus icon Most people who recover from COVID-19 do not experience ongoing health problems. However, some people may experience ongoing symptoms and/or symptoms that come and go. They may experience symptoms four or more weeks after they first were infected with the COVID-19 virus.

Those suffering from ongoing COVID-19 symptoms are often said to have long COVID. Other names for this condition include long-haul COVID, post-COVID syndrome or post-acute COVID-19.

Long COVID symptoms can be debilitating for victims, making it difficult or impossible to work and limiting major life activities, like sleeping, concentrating, breathing, and more.

While long COVID is not listed in the Social Security Administration’s Blue Book, those suffering from this condition may be able to obtain federal disability benefits. However, obtaining benefits for long COVID is likely to be a complex task. That is why you should strongly consider working with an experienced attorney as you seek disability benefits.

Schmidt Kramer’s experienced Harrisburg Social Security Disability attorneys are ready to help you pursue benefits. There are no upfront fees for our services, and we do not get paid unless you receive benefits.

Symptoms of Long COVID

Long COVID can include a wide variety of symptoms that can affect victims physically, cognitively and psychologically. While people who became severely ill with COVID-19 may be more likely to have long-term symptoms, long COVID can happen even if you did not become severely ill when you contracted COVID-19. This is according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Some of the symptoms of long COVID may include:

Shortness of breath
Trouble breathing
Fatigue
Trouble sleeping
Headaches
Coughing
Changes in mood
Brain fog/difficulty concentrating
Rapid heart rate
Dizziness, particularly when standing
Fainting
Autoimmune conditions affecting the lungs, heart, kidneys, skin and brain
Damage to multiple organs
Rash

Changes in your sense of taste or smell
Muscle pain
Joint pain
Diarrhea
Changes in menstrual cycle
Depression
Poor blood flow caused by damage to the circulatory system
Heart inflammation
Increased anxiety
Worsening symptoms after physical exertion, which can be referred to as post-exertional malaise)
And more

Medical professionals are still learning more about post-COVID syndrome and the symptoms victims are experiencing. There may be other symptoms besides the ones listed here. It is not currently known how long people may suffer from long COVID.

How Could Those with Long COVID Qualify for Disability Benefits?

Even though long COVID is a newer condition, it has been classified as a disability under the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) in certain situations. If your symptoms significantly limit your ability to engage in at least one major life activity, it may be considered a disability under the ADA. Major life activities include things like:

Walking
Getting dressed
Bathing
Talking
Eating
Concentrating

Thinking
Interacting with others
Breathing
Learning
Reading

However, you are not eligible for Social Security Disability benefits unless your condition meets the SSA criteria for a disability. Fortunately, the SSA has given disability claims examiners some general guidance on applications for benefits for long COVID. Applicants must prove they have:

A medically determinable impairment that prevents you from working
Symptoms that fit one of the listings in the SSD Blue Book
OR have functional limitations that prevent you from working

Medically Determinable Impairment

You must provide evidence of a medically determinable impairment. The SSA will need you to provide one of the following:

Positive viral test
Diagnostic test consistent with COVID-19, such as a chest x-ray
Medical diagnosis and symptoms that are consistent with COVID-19

You must also prove your impairment will prevent you from working for at least one year. However, it is important to note the SSA will consider more than just your symptoms when determining the duration of your illness.

For example, your symptoms may cause a new medically determinable impairment, such as an illness affecting a vital organ, like your kidneys. Evidence that long COVID has worsened an existing illness, such as an illness affecting your lungs, may also help show your condition will affect you for at least one year.

For some applicants, it may be unclear if or when long COVID symptoms may stop. In these situations, a decision on your application may be deferred for several months.

Symptoms Meet Disability Criteria

Your application must also show your symptoms fit the criteria of one of the listings in the SSD Blue Book. There is no listing for long COVID, but it is possible for COVID-19 symptoms to fit the criteria for another listing.

As COVID can affect the lungs, it may have caused you to develop a chronic respiratory disease. You would need to provide evidence that you suffer from the symptoms under a chronic respiratory disorder in the Blue Book (COPD, pneumonia, sleep apnea).

You may qualify under one of the following listings, depending on your symptoms:

Chronic fatigue syndrome if you suffer from fatigue or endurance issues
Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome if you experience malfunctioning of your autonomic nervous system
Cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure or chronic pulmonary hypertension if you experience cardiovascular problems
Myositis, myofascial pain or reactive arthritis if you have musculoskeletal aches and pains

Functional Limitations

You may still be eligible for benefits, even if you cannot prove your condition meets the criteria for one of the disability listings. You would need to show your condition causes functional limitations that prevent you from working. The SSA would need to do an assessment of your physical abilities (standing, sitting, crouching, walking, stooping, lifting, grasping items, etc.).

Long COVID can also affect your cognitive abilities. If you include this on your application, the SSA would need to do an assessment of your mental abilities, which may include your ability to:

Paying attention to your work for long periods of time
Understanding, remembering and following directions

Recalling work tasks and procedures
Tolerating the regular stress of your job
And more

Contact Us to Discuss Your Claim for Disability Benefits

Give us a call today to discuss your application for disability benefits. We are also prepared to help you appeal a denied claim.

Our firm has been assisting Social Security Disability applicants for decades and we have a proven track record of securing benefits for our clients. Our client reviews page contains numerous reviews from Social Security Disability clients.

There are no upfront fees with our services, which means no risk in contacting us to discuss how we may be able to help you.

Schmidt Kramer. Licensed. Local. Lawyers. Call (717) 510-1782.

Free Case Review

No Upfront Fees

Recent Results

$10,043,952.13 Personal Injury
Schmidt Kramer, P.C.partner Gerard C. Kramer won a personal injury action for $10,043,952.13 in Northumberland County on behalf of a volunteer firefighter who was the victim of Intentional Tort. The 50-year-old volunteer firefighter was seriously injured when a barn collapsed, causing a spinal injury which left him a paraplegic. The claim was brought against the arsonist who intentionally started the fire. It is believed that the verdict is the highest ever in Northumberland County.
View Results
$4,034,000.00 Personal Injury
Yesterday a Judge in Union County (Lewisburg, PA) awarded a couple from New Berlin, Pennsylvania, over $4,000,000 because the husband was shot while turkey hunting.You might ask yourself, how does a turkey hunting accident end up with that type of verdict? In order to understand the verdict you would have to know our clients. They are good people who had their life wrecked. Plus, you would have to know the defendant, who should not have been hunting with a gun because he was prohibited after a previous criminal conviction.It is a good verdict, because the Judge was able to do two things with his decision. First, he communicated to two very good people that their losses were something that those of us on the outside could appreciate and value. Mike Hobbins (our client) is a 51 year old guy who lost his sight because a convicted felon --who should not have even possessed a gun-- went hunting illegally, and broke with impunity the most fundamental rule in hunting: identify your target before you pull the trigger. The Judge accepted the financial loss Mr. Hobbins' suffered, but listened closely to the evidence of less tangible losses. When Mike broke down on the stand, because his daughter would end up walking him down the aisle at her wedding, as opposed to how it was supposed to go, the Judge was listening. When Mike could not keep it together, because of how emasculating it was for him not to be able to provide financially for his family, the Judge was listening. It was facts like these that the Judge cited to support the $2,000,000 award for non-economic damages. Second, the Judge wanted to send a message. Union County is a hunting county. Many of the residents hunt there, and people from outside the area come to Union County to hunt. It was my impression, from the Judge's statements as he rendered his decision, that he wanted to send a message to the people in Union County to protect them in their sport. The rules in place to restrict people convicted of crimes not to have a gun are not to be broken. Hunting is serious and you have to identify your target before you shoot. When you turn your back on the rules that are set to provide safety in a sport, you risk being an example. Here, the $1,000,000 punitive damage award sends that message loud and clear.When it really comes down to brass tacks, the right action was taken against a Defendant who may never truly appreciate what kind of impact his reckless choices caused.At Schmidt Kramer, we are injury lawyers. That means we work with people who were hurt in car accidents, who were hurt by the neglect of nursing homes, or those that were seriously injured because of the reckless, thoughtless acts of others. If you or a loved one have been injured in Pennsylvania, we may be able to help. While the verdict yesterday is not one that is representative of every case we do, it does show that serious and dedicated representation can bring good results.Joe ChapmanJanuary 18, 2013
View Results
$2,200,000.00 Auto Accidents
On Monday, January 6, 2014, Schmidt Kramer accident lawyer Scott Cooper obtained a verdict on behalf of his client who is the widow of a man who died in a fiery crash on Interstate 78 in Lebanon County. The awarded verdict of $2.2 million was in a nonjury proceeding before a federal judge in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. That verdict includes $100,000 in punitive damages assessed against the owner of the trucking company.Kamilah Claxton won summary judgment in November after the defendants, Sukhwinder Singh and the trucking company for which he worked, failed to file a brief in opposition to Claxton's motion, which was made in September. The verdict in Claxton v. Singh was issued after the court held a non-jury assessment of damages earlier this month."Mr. Sukhchan Singh, the employer, is liable on the basis of respondent superior, but was also grossly negligent in failing to maintain his vehicle in compliance with state and federal law, particularly with regard to having required safety inspections and correcting defects in its braking equipment," said U.S. District Judge William W. Caldwell of the Middle District of Pennsylvania in his opinion accompanying the verdict."He was also grossly negligent in entrusting his vehicle to Sukhwinder Singh, an inexperienced truck driver who had failed the written test and driving test multiple times before finally earning his commercial driving license," Caldwell said.
View Results
$1,200,000.00 Personal Injury
A Dauphin County jury has awarded a $1.2 million verdict to the parents of a 5-year-old who had an anoxic brain injury and stopped breathing after he had a tonsillectomy.2012-06-26 10:00:00 AMDate of Verdict: June 19. 2012Court and Case No.: C.P. Dauphin County No. 2009-CV-14003-MMJudge: Scott EvansType of Action: Medical malpracticeInjuries: Anoxic brain injuryPlaintiffs Counsel: Terry S. Hyman, Schmidt Kramer, HarrisburgPlaintiffs Experts: Dr. Anna H. Messner, liability; Lucille Packer, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Palo Alto, Calif.; Terry P. Leslie, vocations and earning capacity, Lancaster; Dr. Hilary B. Berlin, pediatric psychiatry, Great Neck, N.Y.Defense Counsel: Andrew H. Foulkrod, Darlene K. King, Foulkrod Ellis, Camp Hill, PADefense Experts: James C. Reilly, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Wilmington, DEComment: A Dauphin County jury has awarded a $1.2 million verdict to the parents of a 5-year-old who had an anoxic brain injury and stopped breathing after he had a tonsillectomy.The entire verdict came against Dr. Andrew M. Shapiro, the doctor who plaintiffs Reginald Graham and Tykeisha Metz alleged chose to have the boy monitored at a pediatric ward. The plaintiffs argued Shapiro failed to tell nurses caring for the baby about, and how to care for, the boy's enhanced risk for respiratory failure.The jury came back on June 19 and awarded Reginald Graham and Tykeisha Mets $500,000 in non-economic damages and $686,170 in loss of future earning capacity, according to the plaintiffs counsel.According to the statement, the baby's mother brought him to Shapiro because she was "'afraid that he might stop breathing during his sleep,'" the plaintiffs' pretrial statement said. Shapiro performed a sleep study and observed the baby's Apnea Hypopnea Index to be 43 — four times higher than what's considered severe. A tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy were performed.According to the plaintiffs, the baby's sleep study results put him at an increased risk for post-operative respiratory complications. Despite this, they argued in the statement, Shapiro ordered the pediatric nurses at the Harrisburg Hospital general pediatric ward to observe the boy as they would any other patients — about once every four hours.The pretrial statement said that one in four children who have an AHI in the 40s and oxygen desaturation below 80 have some type of respiratory problem. The younger the child, the greater the risk of a respiratory problem, the statement said.According to the statement, Shapiro took off the child's pulse oximeter, the finger-mounted device used to measure blood oxygen, and ordered a heart and respiratory rate monitor. The child was 11 months old at the time.The plaintiffs pled that the baby was last seen at 4 a.m. There was no record of his oxygen saturation for the next hour and 45 minutes. He stopped breathing a 6:40 a.m., and his brain was without oxygen long enough to cause demonstrable injury on an MRI."Immediately prior to his surgery, [the child] was a normal child, who could say mama, eat finger foods, and was just on the verge of walking," the statement said. "After his code, [he] was like a newborn. He could not lift his head or sit up. He could not talk. He could not move."In his pretrial statement, Shapiro argued that he recognized the child's pre-operative sleep study showed he was driven to breath by decreased blood oxygen saturation, which he said was typical in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.He argued the American Academy of Otolaryngology dictates that admission to the intensive care unit is not the standard of care. In the statement, he said nurses did not observe signs of respiratory distress. No alarms sounded until the child arrested, the statement said.He said the baby likely arrested as a result of hypoglycemia and/or an acute aspiration, which he argued would not have been identified by blood oxygen saturation.— Ben Present, of the Law Weekly
View Results
$1,024,040.80 Auto Accidents
Scott Cooper settled a wrongful death case on behalf of the widow of a police office who was killed in a car accident in the line of duty for $1,024,040.80. The claim against the other driver was amicably resolved before suit was filed for the entire available policy limits for the other driver. The case took place in Adams County, PA.
View Results

Testimonials

Dear Scott,
Hello there! I’m a little late to the game here, but I wanted to be certain I wrote to you. Oops—sorry for the typo! As you’ve probably gathered, I am writing you from a typewriter. Do you still use these in the office? Back on topic, I wanted to take a moment to express my deep gratitude for your guidance and support throughout the entire legal process for my accident. Can you believe it’s been five years?? Your attention to detail, professionalism, and delicate handling of my case made an incredibly difficult time more manageable for me and my family. We’re forever grateful.
From the moment you stepped foot in that hospital room with me, I felt relieved to have someone in my corner like you and your team. You took the time not only to explain each legal step in a way that made sense but also to acknowledge the emotional weight of what I was going through. That delicate balance—handling the intricacies of my case with precision while also being sensitive to my well-being—is something I will always be grateful for. In many ways, the outcome of the case reflected your dedication, but what has stayed with me even more is how you treated me throughout the process—with patience, respect, and compassion. You listened to my concerns and reassured me in moments of uncertainty. And even now, I feel your compassion each year on my birthday when I receive a text from you!
Thank you, not just for the outcome, but for the way you handled each moment. You are an incredible lawyer, but more importantly, an incredible person, and I was fortunate to have you in my corner.
With heartfelt gratitude,
Ricky D
Definitely were people of their word. Certainly helped me through my whole case
The legal team was very professional and met my needs I would highly recommend them
Monte cargile
Very great experience working with you guys continue the great service timely response communication well understand
jackie duffus
Schmidt Kramer is simply definition of hardworking, they are trustworthy and get best claim you could never think of.

Are People Suffering from Long COVID Eligible for Social Security Disability Benefits?